Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Waveform on the tube

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sango123 (e) 18:12, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Waveform on the tube

Contested Prod. Original prod by RHaworth was "badly spelled vanity: http://www.freewebs.com/dincov1 is the website of author user:Unisouth" -- Blue520 15:04, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. non-notable website per WP:WEB & non-notable bio per WP:BIO --Blue520 15:04, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Vanity. Veiled advertising - Waveform proffesionional web designers were deleted from here by this AfD. -- RHaworth 16:30, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
• delete vanity, original research. Bucketsofg 16:40, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Unencyclopædic, non-notable, badly-spelt & poorly-concealed advertising.  (aeropagitica)  19:32, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 02:16, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. This user has been on tubechallenge.com forums saying his attempt and his http://www.freewebs.com/waveformonthetube/attempts.htm page route is a nearly exact reverse of the All Lines Challenge by Neil Blake & Geoff Marshall. Tubechallenger 18:29, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.