Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Watton United F.C. (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Carioca 18:50, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Watton United F.C.

Watton United F.C. (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

procedural nomination Previously considered as part of a mass-AFD Aug 2006 with result 'keep'; tagged for PROD-based deletion Sept 2007 but should have been brought back here. The original AFD discussion began with an assertion that the F.C. did not meet WP:CORP. The Sep 2007 PROD was accompanied by the following assetion: "Amateur football club playing below Step 7 and having never played above that level. No other apparent reason for notability (e.g. cup run)." User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 21:05, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of football (soccer)-related deletions. —User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 21:08, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete total absence of independent sources. Guy (Help!) 21:50, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Clubs plays below step 7 and has no reason for notability. Number 57 22:24, 8 September 2007 (UTC) Keep New evidence from ChrisTheDude shows the club has played at a notable level in the past. Number 57 23:30, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
• This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of football (soccer) related deletions. ChrisTheDude 23:13, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
• Weak keep as per the Football Club History Database, the team has in the past played as high as the Eastern Counties League Premier Division, which is at step 5 and therefore within the generally-agreed notability guidelines. Article could do with expansion/improvement, though..... ChrisTheDude 23:17, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
• Weak keep - Evidently, the club has played at a notable level in the past. However, the article does require a bit of an overhaul. - PeeJay 23:40, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
• Keep per ChrisTheDude. I have added a sentence to assert notability but there do not seem to be a lot of sources to draw on so to improve the article. --Malcolmxl5 01:23, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
• Keep - would have passed the frequently applied barrier for English football clubs of being at Level 10 or above, with a level to spare in the past, and as notability isn't temporary, the article should remain. - fchd 07:14, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.