Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wattle Glen Cricket Club
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete all. ChetblongT C 03:21, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Wattle Glen Cricket Club
Non-notable cricket club. Does not meet WP:ORG. The overwhelming majority of players in the club would be amateurs and the cricket is of a social nature. Mattinbgn\talk 11:33, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following related pages for the same reason as above. All clubs play in the same competition and at a similar standard:
- Lower Eltham Cricket Club (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
- Eltham Cricket Club (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) -- Mattinbgn\talk 11:39, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- Mattinbgn\talk 11:39, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. —Mattinbgn\talk 11:40, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per nom as un-notable Cricket club. Also the article is so poorly written that after reading the article i still have no idea what country it is in (a small bit of research reveals it to be in Australia). --Greatestrowerever (talk) 11:41, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
- Delete all of these — possibly even Speedy Delete A7. Stephen Turner (Talk) 12:15, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:ORG. Might also be worth deleting the template at the bottom of the article too. Twenty Years 13:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - Agree with nom - does not meet WP:ORG--VS talk 01:16, 24 February 2008 (UTC) Having just looked at the other 2 (all 3) I agree - delete all as not notable for wikipedia.--VS talk 01:17, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
