Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Waterfront Tower

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Carlossuarez46 01:31, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Waterfront Tower

Waterfront Tower (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Contested prod. As I said in the proposed deletion: "This article has no reliable sources, and the data on the tower is speculative at best. Until there is more concrete (no pun inteneded) information available about this building, we shouldn't have an article on it." Powers ^T 00:37, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of architecture, buildings, construction, city planning and public spaces-related deletions. —Powers ^T 00:43, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

• Delete: Phrases inculded in the article such as "extremely early rendition", "is highly likely that it is not built, ot either built under another name" and "Very little is known about it" confirm that the article should be deleted because Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Tomj 00:50, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. I combed the website the article points to and found the project exists... they build low-rise residential and commercial buildings. No mention of any tower, let alone a 600m+ one. Maybe the author of the article has insider information, but until they start mixing the cement, delete per WP:CRYSTAL. --Targeman 01:15, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per nom and WP:CRYSTAL. No sources are provided about the construction, and the "Early Rendition" graphic (Image:Waterfront_Tower.png) has no definite source either. The picture could be generic clip art. The article could also possibly be a WP:HOAX --Nenyedi ^TalkDeeds_@ 01:29, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:CRYSTAL,it appears that this building is not built, wait until the actual building is made. Oysterguitarist 03:43, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.