Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Water export

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep(nomination withdrawn) Peacent 02:16, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Water export

Water export (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This isn't an article--this is an essay, and a highly POV one at that. Blueboy96 21:22, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

• Strong delete as an essay, violation of WP:NPOV. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?)} 21:41, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete An essay not an article. Obina 22:29, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

*Pull the plug per nom. --Targeman 22:41, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

• Keep, greatly improved by Bláthnaid. Good work. --Targeman 14:25, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Delete There is an article to be written on this subject but I can't find it in this essay. --Stormbay 01:13, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

• Strong keep I've rewritten the article. I think it's up to scratch now. <crystal ball>If Wikipedia is around in 2050, this will be one of the most edit-warred articles on it, unfortunately. --Bláthnaid 14:15, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
• Strong keep Sterling job. Consider my nomination withdrawn. Blueboy96 17:55, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
  • comment Nice job! There's the article!--Stormbay 18:06, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.