Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wasi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. no sources Mr.Z-man 22:43, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Wasi

Wasi (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Individual fails WP:BIO notability criteria. Cursory g-search reveals nothing in terms of coverage from multiple third party reliable sources. Most of the results themselves are mirrors of the Wikipedia pages discussing this individual. Hence, I feel the article merits deletion. ITAQALLAH 18:28, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. ITAQALLAH 18:32, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Keep: May I request you to not to delete this article instead place a tag of incompletion, meanwhile as you can see that I am working on it, hopefully will get back with some sources soon.--سگِ گوھرشاہی 06:37, 25 February 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Iamsaa (talk • contribs)

Keep:I am also working on this and it is a part of my project of His Holiness Sayyedna Riaz Ahmed Gohar Shahi.--Asikhi (talk) 10:27, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

• Delete unless someone (either of the users above?) can present reliable third-party sources that assert WP:BIO notability. — Scientizzle 16:33, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
• Comment please note that Iamsaa (talk · contribs) is the "office bearer of Anjuman Serfaroshan-e-Islam" and Asikhi (talk · contribs) is the "Press & Information Secretary" of Anjuman Serfaroshan-e-Islam. Anjuman Serfaroshan-e-Islam is the religious movement founded by this guy and currently run by the subject of the article. WP:COI anyone? — Scientizzle 16:42, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Looks like it ^_^. In any case, assertion of notability must be based upon proofs outlined here. Without such, making a case for keeping this article is unlikely to be successful. ITAQALLAH 22:43, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
• Keep: He is the president of an International Movement isn't it enough to argue that he is notable enough to have an article with his name? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Falconkhe (talk • contribs) 09:07, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
  • In a word, no. If there are no independent reliable sources upon which to create an encyclopedic biography, there is nothing to keep. Running an organization of questionable notability isn't a sufficiently strong claim to override WP:BLP and WP:N concerns. — Scientizzle 22:15, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. The threshold for inclusion on Wikipedia is verifiability, and currently there are no sources to verify that this individual is notable. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 16:53, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.