Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Warrior's Refuge

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. A current Amazon bestseller in several categories is persuasive even beyond the consensus. Non-admin closure.  RGTraynor  09:54, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Warrior's Refuge (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Nothing in here to suggest notability for this. The only source is the Amazon page. 80% of the article is a plot summary. I say delete unless notability can be proven through reliable sources. Metros (talk) 18:34, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

• Comment May I ask you to consider retiring this deletion request for a month or so? From what the article says, the manga was released on December 26, and you nominated it on December 29. Some more time should be given to estabilish if it meets the criteria.--Aldux (talk) 15:34, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
  • In the same vein, couldn't the article wait to be created until a month from now if it does eventually meet the criteria? Metros (talk) 15:55, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
• Merge to Warriors (novel series), trim and tidy up. SilkTork *^SilkyTalk 18:11, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
• Keep! Give it some time! The creator of the article obviously didn't give much thought in, but with a little will stop talking about deleting it and start working! You can't expect all articles to be perfect in less than a week. IceUnshattered (talk) 23:01, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
• Merge to Warriors (novel series) Also, I nominated all the other articles on warriors books - I'd like to point out that even though the book was recently released, none of the other articles meet WP:FICT and I don't think this article ever will. Corvus coronoides _{talk 03:10, 2 January 2008 (UTC)}
• Keep is a best-seller on Amazon. Catchpole (talk) 15:55, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
• Stubify and keep Give it some time. Jtrainor (talk) 19:00, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
• Keep - "based on a best-selling book series" seems to assert notability. The book just came out, so give it more time to let this article grow. Time will tell whether it meets WP:FICT. -FrankTobia (talk) 20:50, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
• Keep book is in top 500 at Amazon, book before it is in top 200. I'm not finding reliable reviews, but I don't see how they can't be out there. Hobit (talk) 05:01, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.