Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Warlord2000ad

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was userfy. Kilo-Lima|^(talk) 19:02, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Warlord2000ad

Prod tag removed, so to AfD it goes. This is a self-written (by User:Jonwillis) vanity bio/profile of a non-notable video game enthusiast. Lots of posts on gaming forums and even being a mod on the Electronic Arts forum don't seem notable enough. Could also be userfied? Canley 08:33, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. -AED 08:35, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
• Userfy Danny Lilithborne 10:09, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
• Userfy --Tone 11:32, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
• Userfy --User:warlord200ade 16:32, 14 April 2006 (GMT)

Not to sure if i added my message correctly there, but i admit i should have read the rules more throughly i just glanced over it. What would one have to do to be classed as notable? I know that warlord2000ad is unquie to me and i often get stuff when i join new communities, games etc, hey is that you warlord2000ad from x game, or y game. part of the high end of BFROE now if you have heard of it, basically its like BF2RS but deals with stat padders etc, but running on a online ticketing system sorted out by MYIS. —Preceding unsigned comment added by User:Jonwillis (talk • contribs)

They're not rules as such, but the notability guidelines for biographical articles on Wikipedia can be found at Wikipedia:Notability (people). Ideally this article would be userfied, that is copied onto your user page (click on User:Jonwillis, edit and past the text) rather than the main article space. --Canley 08:23, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

Ok, ive copied it into my area, thanks for your patience, delete away :P

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.