Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Warden Leo Glynn
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. as third-party sourcing exists per the link below, try to nominate many of the immates articles for redirecting or deletion though Secret account 21:28, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Warden Leo Glynn
This character does not establish notability through the inclusion of real world information from reliable sources. Most of the information is original research and extremely unnecessary plot details. There is no current assertion for improvement. TTN (talk) 00:57, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Article fails WP:FICT. Corvus coronoides talk 01:51, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
- Delete, for sourcing concerns, although I'm sure an Oz wiki out there could use the material.-Wafulz (talk) 04:01, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep Important character in a notable series. Article needs cleanup and improvement, but that's not a reason for deletion. Edward321 (talk) 04:11, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
Keep. Maintanance needed. --Funper (talk) 23:24, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep Please recall topics are notable, not articles. http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=Warden+Leo+Glynn&hl=en&c2coff=1&rlz=1B3GGGL_enUS176US236&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tab=wn makes it look likely this topic is notable. Hobit (talk) 15:48, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.