Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wank Week

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was nomination withdrawn anemone|projectors 14:37, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wank Week

Wank Week (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

The article is about a series of television programmes that were never broadcast due to their controversial nature. Yes, there are references, but WP:NOT#NEWS and it seems as though this has been postponed indefinitely or cancelled. h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 10:52, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

  • I oppose the merge as this would not be relevant enough for inclusion in an article about the whole TV channel. That's the reason why we don't mention Borat in the Kazakhstan article. Actually, I'm beginning to wish I'd never nominated this as I do kind of see it as notable, but I just want to get opinions.-h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 20:00, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
  • comment - then why not withdraw your nomination? This isn't for the most part, a place to get opinions on something unless you already have a negative (i.e., !vote of delete) opinion about an article. Grutness...wha? 00:24, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
  • In case the nominator doesn't get around to withdrawing the nom, Keep. Sourced and informative article. THE KING 09:26, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Coredesat 04:54, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep, multiple secondary sources cover this and there's no obvious merge target. The web of links would be improved if Masturbate-a-thon linked here, and perhaps the Grade stuff is irrelevant - he'd long since left Channel 4 - but I can't see a fundamental problem with this page.TheGrappler 05:07, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep - sourced sociological commentary. digitalemotion 07:54, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep - this was a notable UK television controversy LeContexte 11:43, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
  • As the nominator, I withdraw my nomination.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 13:10, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.