Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Walter ReMine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep - bad-faith deletion with Teh Pulpo being a ReMine opponent and Walter ReMine being an admitted impersonator DS 15:40, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Walter ReMine

NN. Teh Pulpo 04:06, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

• Weak keep. Apparently exceeds my ability to recognize non-notability. While he himself gets 278 'real' ghits, the search [ "Walter ReMine" biotic Message theory ] gets about 200 'real' ghits. I guess the chief problem is the limited audience for his ideas? I'm biased towards leaving the marginal in, awaiting the long-term view. Shenme 05:30, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
• Keep - has multiple articles written from independent, restrictively published sources. --Eyrian 06:06, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
• Weak delete. Walter's work has yet to be remarked upon by a reliable third-party source. Walter ReMine 06:21, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.