The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was speedy deleted as empty page. (ESkog)(Talk) 00:57, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
This seems to be a hoax, or at least unverifiable. No ghits for author, only hits for name are completely unrelated. DeleteMakemi 07:02, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
Delete- I can't find anything on Goolge either. Reyk 07:09, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
Delete {{hoax}} article, along with the dodecahedron-related pages. (aeropagitica) 07:45, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
Comment. Author blanked the page, so marking it {{empty}}. Weregerbil 14:52, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.