The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was blatant copy-vio qualifing for speedy deletion.--cj | talk 07:45, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
was nominated for speedy as advertising. WP:DEL says to use AFD for advertising. Article as written is clearly advertising, but does claim notability as first and biggest. No vote. --Scott DavisTalk 22:06, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
It is a copyvio of this [1] Copyvio reported and nominated for speedy deletion. Capitalistroadster 22:30, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
Speedy Delete for copoyright, regular Delete for non-notability. Jtmichcock 02:05, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.