Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Waldo's wallpaper

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 08:21, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Waldo's wallpaper

Non-notable, vanity —Preceding unsigned comment added by Trebor Rowntree (talk • contribs)

  • Keep - No advertising and not for profit site - if you like we can delete it and I will add it back so we can strike the silly "vanity" fru-fru. Also, his site is notable having been written up in Computer Graphics World Magazine and it's been in yahoo for over nine years.
    • Jmunchovie, you have to sign your posts with four tildes (like this ~~~~ in order for your votes to count.) --Saforrest 04:45, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete nn - WP:BAI for several reasons.Bridesmill 01:46, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete No Alexa ranking, fails WP:WEB. OhNoitsJamieTalk 02:03, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Not notable. DarthVader 04:05, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Not notable. That it has no advertising and is nonprofit makes no difference; there is no evidence of notability currently present. As well, we have seen lots of vanity articles for noncommercial sites. --Saforrest 04:45, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, while jmunchovie's defense is admirable, it doesn't change the fact that the subject of the article is non-notable Nortelrye 05:32, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete/merge site doesn't rise to real notability, but the pictures on it are nice. Its url could be listed in a list of external links in an article about artwork of this type. Phr 05:48, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, nn. RexNL 14:52, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete non-notable. --Siva1979Talk to me 15:52, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, WP:WEB noncompliant, agree with Phr under right conditions. Deizio 16:13, 16 April 2006 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.