Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Walden Pond State Reservation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedily merged --SPUI (talk - don't use sorted stub templates!) 03:53, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Walden Pond State Reservation

There is no text on this page, except for the pointless "See also" part. The article should be deleted or merged with Walden Pond. If merged, I suggest Walden Pond State Reservation be redirected to Walden Pond. --Thorri 16:25, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

• Agreed, but you can merge and redirect it boldly. bikeable (talk) 16:58, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, unless you consider adding that one link to Walden Pond a Merge, and Redirect to aforementioned article. Dan 17:54, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
  • I think merging the little information there is in the article with Walden Pond and then redirecting it is the best option. I'll do it. --Thorri 21:08, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.