Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Waffley

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. bainer (talk) 00:08, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Waffley

Delete. At best this is an obscure joke; see Google. Melchoir 00:48, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as unverifiable/non-notable. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-01-11 01:35Z
• Delete speedy as patent nonsense--MONGO 05:49, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as hoax - it's coherent, so unfortunately its not patent nonsense. It is, however Complete Bollocks -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 06:15, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per above DaGizza ^Chat 07:31, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as hoax. VegaDark 09:16, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Hoax ComputerJoe 18:47, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Whether truthful or not, it is too small to be notable enough for inclusion WAvegetarian ^(talk) (email) ^(contribs) 21:20, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Complete bollocks. Kafziel 23:32, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Probably CB, as above.--SarekOfVulcan 00:01, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per nn. Dustimagic *\o/* ^{(talk/contribs)} *\o/* 00:51, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, per nominator. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 07:17, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --Terence Ong ^Talk 13:59, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.