Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Waaay

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. Slippery slope. Keeping this opens the pandora's box. Woohookitty 9 July 2005 08:27 (UTC)

[edit] Waaay

Mispelling are not enciclopedic items Cate 30 June 2005 14:09 (UTC)

• Merge into Pronunciation spelling as an example of a deliberate mispelling made for purposes of emphasis. Nateji77 30 June 2005 15:11 (UTC)
• Merge per Nateji77, as this is otherwise a dicdef. -- BD2412 ^talk June 30, 2005 15:19 (UTC)
• Merge per Nateji77. Sietse 30 June 2005 15:22 (UTC)
• Delete, no merge. JFW | T@lk 30 June 2005 15:40 (UTC)
• Merge with Misspelling and Pronunciation spelling. Its relevant to both. The Redirect would best go to Mispelling since thats what it is. Falphin 30 June 2005 16:22 (UTC)

do we really need a redirect? Nateji77 30 June 2005 16:28 (UTC)

Well not really, since it will probably be on the first of the list anyway. Falphin 30 June 2005 17:14 (UTC)

• Delete, because what's to distinguish this from "waay" or "waaaay"? Too slippery a slope. Dcarrano 30 June 2005 18:52 (UTC)

nothing. but i dont see why we would need to distinguish between the two. pick one, use that one, forego the redirects. Nateji77 3 July 2005 09:38 (UTC)

• Delete as per Dcarrano. --Carnildo 30 June 2005 22:37 (UTC)
• Delete as per Dcarrano. Waaay too slippery. JamesBurns 1 July 2005 03:35 (UTC)
• Delete. Is this entry useful? No Waaay. --WCFrancis 4 July 2005 12:00 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.