Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/W (alphabet)

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. —Xezbeth 19:45, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] W (alphabet)

A recent cut-paste to become the only letter of the alphabet with a dis-ambiguation suffix. What's silly is the 2-letter combination template at the bottom. Georgia guy 19:39, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Pointless duplication, and horizontal scrolling makes Baby Jesus cry. AиDя01DTALKEMAIL 19:53, Jun 3, 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Entirely duplicates the contents of W, breaks template, etc. --Tabor 19:55, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • I see now, a misguided attempt to turn W into a disambig page instead of adding W (jpop) (non-existent article) to list of possible meanings already on the page. --Tabor 19:59, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Dwelwete. Duplicative. -- BD2412 ^talk 20:18, 2005 Jun 3 (UTC)
• delete. I am wondering why this case is not covered by speeedy deletion. mikka (t) 20:55, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete anyway - arguably it's vandalism, or nonsense, or a test. Either way, somebody kill it before it spreads. sjorford →•← 22:58, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • The markup for that comment is just... frightening... Also, delete qw ickly. -- Jonel 04:33, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete duplication. JamesBurns 05:11, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.