Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WWF Undisputed Title

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was Redirect. Golbez 06:31, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] WWF Undisputed Title

A much better version of this article already exists (WWE Undisputed Championship). I say either delete this article or just make it into a redirect to the other article. -- CMC 18:08, Jun 12, 2005 (UTC)

• Keep Jinkleberries 19:52, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Note: Junkleberries is a new account today and voted 'keep' on 37 articles within a 7-minute period. This user also received a vandalism warning today. Tobycat 21:05, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Jinkleberries 19:52, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Oops, our friend Jinkeberries hit the 'paste' function twice on this one. Tobycat 21:05, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect Christopher Parham (talk) 20:55, 2005 Jun 12 (UTC)
• Redirect to WWE Undisputed Championship: doesn't say anything that isn't already covered in the latter article. — Gwalla | Talk 22:36, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect as the WWF doesn't exist anymore after it got sued by the Word Wildlife Fund and lost... And can someone please ban Junkleberries! Sasquatch′↔Talk↔Contributions 22:42, Jun 12, 2005 (UTC)
  • According to his talkpage, Jinkleberries was banned for vandalism yesterday. — Gwalla | Talk 16:11, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to WWE Undisputed Championship. JamesBurns 04:36, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect pretty obviously to WWE Undisputed Championship. Paulley 19:30, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.