Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WWE Smackdown! Board (IGN)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was swift deletion as the articles about a group of people with no claims of notability and could very well be called an attack article in some places. There's really no reason for this to carry on for five days. Wickethewok 14:41, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] WWE Smackdown! Board (IGN)

  ATTENTION!

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on a forum, please note that this is not a majority vote, but rather a discussion to establish a consensus among Wikipedia editors on whether a page is suitable for this encyclopedia. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines to help us decide this, and deletion decisions are made on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

Nonetheless, you are welcome to participate and express your opinions. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments by suspected single-purpose accounts can be tagged using {{subst:spa|username}}

Article about a somewhat non-notable bulletin board that contains primarily information about individual users, and seems to be attacking some of them. Is being edited at an alarming rate. - Bootstoots 01:35, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

01:39, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

    • Comment - I've requested page protection for it due to rampant vandalism. I hope that helps out. - Bootstoots 01:51, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - They claim it's the second most active forum on the IGN Boards, but the first most active forum on that board, The Vestibule wasn't kept either. Icep 01:41, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete message board articles that talk about the posters are rarely worth keeping. Danny Lilithborne 01:57, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, per vanity/original reserch/verification/nom. hateless 01:58, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per vanispamcruftisement and constant vandalism to the page. Ryūlóng 02:01, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Naconkantari 02:02, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom, it seems to be little more than bios about people on a single forum of a messageboard. TJ Spyke 02:04, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete WP:VSCA. ViridaeTalk 02:36, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Smack it down. --Cassavau
  • Delete per Cassavau. —Ben FrantzDale 03:50, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per Cassavau -- Deville (Talk) 04:08, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete message boards are usually not notable. -- Gogo Dodo 04:42, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:WEB. --Metropolitan90 06:01, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete A web board about a staged sport? What do you talk about? "My fake guy can beat up your fake guy?" --Xrblsnggt 06:38, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. --NeoChaosX (talk | contribs) 07:11, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete — 5 letters: WP:WEB - Glen 07:52, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete as non-notable website. — Adrian Lamo ·· 09:07, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, fails WP:WEB, vanispamcruftisment. --Terence Ong (Chat | Contribs) 09:29, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Smacked down by WP:WEB. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 13:16, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, WP:WEB applies. --Kinu t/c 13:41, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.