Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WWEEKEND

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. Enochlau 04:53, 3 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] WWEEKEND

Completely non-notable gathering. Parts could be considered an attack page. Delete --JiFish(^Talk/_Contrib) 14:52, 28 November 2005 (UTC)

• Delete unadulterated nonsense of the finest quality. chowells 14:55, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete a textbook example of a vanity article. Demiurge 15:52, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Its a pity, the writer of the article probably spent a bit of time working on this article. Or not. Croat Canuck 17:58, 28 November 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Ah, I'm sorry. I onoly wrote it because I had a rfee afternoon at college. I was very bored and I needed something to write about. It is a pity because it took something like an hour to write. It is unadulterated nonesense of the finest quality because I really wasn't taking my time with how truly disturbing The Hunt's actions were. Also, this was supposed to be the start of a campaign to get The Hunt booted out of our media class. Come on, people, it's just a laugh (well, for those who were there, anyway). Delete it if you want. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.81.39.249 (talk • contribs) 2005-11-29 08:36:01 (UTC)

• Delete?. Having said that, what does it matter if it's just a group of 17 year olds discussing with others in the college about an entertaining night. This thing, this WWEEKEND, is nothing and shouldn't even be relevant to you higher powers. Just leave it alone and ignore it, and it'll go away through the slow decay of time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.81.39.249 (talk • contribs) 2005-11-29 08:38:46 (UTC)

• Speedy delete G7, author has voted "delete" twice above. — Haeleth Talk 17:39, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.