Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WRC guitars

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Ritz Guitars. I know there were no explicit \"relist\" suggestions, but this content is better covered under the target article. Should substantial infomation be found to make a standalone article about WRC, the redirect can be removed. ɑʀкʏɑɴ 14:33, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WRC guitars

WRC guitars (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Content fork from Ritz Guitars so this is redundant. Seraphim ^Whipp 12:53, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

• Comment. I actually meant to prod this... d'oh... Now I realise this should be speedied for advertising... Seraphim ^Whipp 13:03, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
• Merge with Ritz Guitars, leaving WRC guitars as the main article. ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 14:02, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
• Comment. I'm a bit rubbish at using TW at the moment 8-). Do you think the link to the catalogue should be removed? That's why I pegged it as advertising, as I thought it might be a subtle attempt. Thanks for sorting it all out :). Seraphim ^Whipp 14:09, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Yeah, it's a link to a scan of a '98 catalog at a password protected site. Kind of puzzling. Luckily the article's author is still around, so there's hope that someone knowledgeable in the subject might consolidate the fork. ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 14:12, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete This one line article will never demonstrate notability. --Gavin Collins 13:17, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.