Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WNBC news team

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was move. W.marsh 16:32, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WNBC news team

WNBC news team (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

For reasons similar to the AfD request for WABC-TV News Team. The information in this article should be moved onto the WNBC page, in case no movement is made on the Merge Into request, then this article should be deleted and its contents can be reconstructed. Rollosmokes 05:05, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

  • Move (as in the other nom) to List of WNBC personalities, a proper subpage of WNBC. As a corporate O&O station in NYC, many of the names are nationally notable as WNBC is the originator of certain network programming. There is also a farm team aspect to placement at the flagship station.--Dhartung | Talk 05:58, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. Informative and useful list. --Nricardo 21:59, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - indiscriminate list. Note that "informative" and "useful" are not valid criteria for inclusion. 81.104.175.145 04:24, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
Comment What exactly makes this list "indiscriminate"? DHowell 02:23, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
A lack of a defining characteristic for inclusion on the list. 81.104.175.145 08:21, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Move to List of WNBC personalities and keep, per Dhartung. Being on a major network affiliate in the #1 TV market makes most of them notable, and the list is to large to be merged back into WNBC. DHowell 02:22, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
    • Comment: Moving to another article defeats the purpose of this AfD. The information is not too large to be merged back into the main article, and can be pared down considerably. Rollosmokes 02:26, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.