Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WMLN

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep (you're welcome to merge).  Grue  09:44, 3 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] WMLN

Does not seem sufficiently notable. It is a college radio station, and the awards won are not particularly impressive(see http://www.curry.edu/Student+Life/Curry+College+Radio/). Unless I am mistaken, the wattage is also low Superm401 | Talk 07:53, 27 November 2005 (UTC)

• Keep. I wouldn't call these guys non-notable, but they should certainly add that link to the page and add some links to the "awards" won. JHMM13 07:57, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Hmm...who's "they"? Let's remember that Wikipedia is not a soapbox. Superm401 | Talk 08:05, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
    • I honestly don't know, but in terms of notability, I think this station is just large enough to "matter."
• Keep. Article could stand some improvement (like some specifics about the mentioned awards), but it's no worse than WCHC, or some of the other articles about FCC licsenced stations in the U.S. D-Rock 08:32, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep non-crufy, verifiable radio station articles. Jacqui^★ 18:12, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
• Merge with the college article, as has been done in several other comparable cases. Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] (W) AfD? 19:29, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
• Merge with the college article. -- Dalbury^(Talk) 01:47, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
• Merge per Dalbury. Stifle 12:57, 1 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.