Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WJOWSA
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - deleted
[edit] WJOWSA
Speedy delete non notable garbage. tagged it {delete} but it gets removed. drini ☎ 18:20, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Wikipedia is not the place to coin neologisms. You 18:33, Jun 6, 2005 (UTC)
- Not Garbage - You have a poorly programmed bot, that does not recognize a word that is in use on Automotive Message boards. Please fix your bot. 141.157.157.100 18:46, 6 Jun 2005
- Been in use for years - This term was coined in the late 90's, and in still in constant use today. (12.42.63.59 18:49, 6 Jun 2005
- delete neologism Dunc|☺ 18:58, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, but not speedy--doesn't fit criteria. Meelar (talk) 19:11, Jun 6, 2005 (UTC)
- Scimitar : WJOWSA! How can anyone think this is an encyclopedia article. Delete. --Scimitar 19:35, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Mgm|(talk) 19:48, Jun 6, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, idiosyncratic Internet slang. If it was at all common it would have more than 160 Google hits. ZOMG has managed 43,400 for crying out loud. DopefishJustin (･∀･) 21:36, Jun 6, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, Source http://www.urbandictionary.com <-- Shouldn't it be a dictionary article then? If you've looked at urbandictionary, it's full of the kind of stuff wikipedia deletes anyway....or was when i went there ~2 years ago. Anyway, not notable....and if it were, it should've been in wikipedia instead. By the way, isnt it spelled wowsa?
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
