Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WGWAG

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was transwiki to Wiktionary. —Korath (Talk) 18:03, Mar 17, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] WGWAG

delete question relevance, better on wikitionary? --Boothy443 05:16, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)

• Transwiki, I've heard of the term, but I doubt it warrants an encyclopedia entry. Mgm|^(talk) 10:56, Mar 11, 2005 (UTC)
• Wiktionary takes acronyms, subject to the usual attestation requirements. And this article is close enough to being in the canonical dictionary entry form already that I'll Wiktionarify it in preparation. (So please don't "correct" the missing template!) Uncle G 12:34, 2005 Mar 11 (UTC)
• Transwiki. Megan1967 23:10, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Transwiki, please. Wyss 03:02, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Transwiki, delete, just get rid of it - David Gerard 18:13, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.