Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WANR (AM)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep. Cobra 02:05, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] WANR (AM)

Radio station. No vote. r3m0t talk 02:27, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

  • Strong keep. No reason given for deletion and we have 100s of articles on AM stations. -- JJay 02:29, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep per above. --Pboyd04 02:37, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
  • "Radio station" is not a reason to delete - it's usually a reason to keep. Grutness...wha? 04:18, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep no reason to delete. why was it even nominated? -->Newyorktimescrossword 04:29, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Speedy Keep bad faith nomination? -- MisterHand 05:38, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Speedy keep because nobody has called for its deletion, not even the nominator. Articles should not be brought to AfD unless someone calls for their deletion. --Metropolitan90 05:45, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Comments: The article appears to have been originally (mis)tagged as a speedy. Such mistags are supposed to go here, I believe. I also think the proper name for this article is at WANR-AM. (ESkog)(Talk) 09:45, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
  • The article was speedy tagged by the nom. -- JJay 09:47, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Ah, so it was. How odd. Anyway, my vote is to move per my above comment. (ESkog)(Talk) 06:38, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep per above. Essexmutant 15:38, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.