Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WAMATA
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was - Keep - Peripitus (Talk) 09:51, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] WAMATA
Doesn't seem to be a notable org. No reliable sources found, and the orgs they're associated with are all red links. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 20:41, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 16:40, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 16:40, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. Lots of ghits for an Tanzanian organisation, many of them non-trivial. Appears to be notable organisation [1][2][3]—Preceding unsigned comment added by Julius Sahara (talk • contribs) 17:36, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Scientizzle 15:33, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
Comment Should article survive AFD perhaps a hat note directing those looking for the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA) - should be added. AtaruMoroboshi (talk) 15:40, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
- Keep per above. The article is in serious need of cleanup, but WAMATA does seem to meet WP:CORP in light of references found by Julius Sahara. B.Wind (talk) 07:11, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. As there are no reliable sources cited, I am persuaded that the article does not comply with the verifiability policy. Stifle (talk) 18:43, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
- Keep those are credible sources. Trachys (talk) 13:02, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
- Keep - completely verifiable and coverage in sources appears to demonstrate notability. I will do some work on the article, but in the meantime, AFD is not cleanup. --BelovedFreak 09:44, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
- Keep Verifiable and notable per the sources identified above. Davewild (talk) 21:45, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
