Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/W4ffle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. Robert ^{T | @ | C} 03:56, 14 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] W4ffle

Not only is it nothing but a dictionary definition with no hope of improvement, it's a bogus neologism to boot. Yields only 221 hits on Google, pathetic considering its obvious leet nature, and those are primarily because people use it as a handle. I couldn't find any reliable support for the purported meaning. --Michael Snow 20:17, 8 November 2005 (UTC)

• Delete NN neologism, or plain old-fashioned hatchet job on user with that nick. Just zis Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] :: AfD? 20:40, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete there are countless words that can be created this way. Unless it's very widespread, it's not for the wikipedia (nor for wikctionary). Paolo Liberatore (Talk) 20:44, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. per nom --Rogerd 05:27, 9 November 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.