Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/W00t paradox

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was: speedy deleted as nonsense. Crotalus horridus 20:53, 22 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] W00t_paradox

Non-informative, junk + possibly original research. Splintercellguy 16:29, 22 May 2005 (UTC)

• While it is interesting that people like typing a number of identical characters equivalent to 3 mod 4, I'd say deleeeeeeeeeeete. PlatypeanArchcow 16:42, 22 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Original research. Superm401-Talk 16:51, May 22, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - isn't this in fact patent nonsense? I at least can't make out what it's about. AlexTiefling 17:06, 22 May 2005 (UTC)
• Relegate to BJAODN then delete. Why is this even a VfD candidate? It's clearly Patent Nonsense as AlexTiefling points out. Should be a speedy candidate. Also original research which is vorboten. -SocratesJedi | Talk 17:11, 22 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Transfer to BJAODN complete. Recommending for speedy delete now. -SocratesJedi | Talk 17:16, 22 May 2005 (UTC)

Page speedy deleted as patent nonsense. Denni☯ 18:44, 2005 May 22 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.