Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/W. Jarrett Campbell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 02:24, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] W. Jarrett Campbell

W. Jarrett Campbell

• Vanity article about a pretty non-notable person.

Delete, self-written vanity article. Λinfo 01:39, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 09:51, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Woop woop, boring alert! Almost pure vanity, highly concentrated, with hints of spam. Delete. BTLizard 09:59, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Yes, I wrote this article about myself but only after I found my name linked to a blank page from Carolina RailHawks F.C.. I thought it was better to have a self-written page than a broken link. The article is factual and unlike BTLizard I do not think it's self-aggrandizing but I guess others should judge that. To say this is Spam is a bit much imho. The page is linked now from several other articles and serves the purpose to give detail on a person referenced in other WikiPedia articles. But if you guys don't think it has a purpose, feel free to delete it. --Wjarrettc 10:28, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete: better to have no link at all to a non-notable person than a red link. I'd also be very dubious about the notability of Triangle Soccer Fanatics. --Pak21 10:46, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Only shot at meriting inclusion would be the professor test, which he seems to flunk. Would the author object to userfying the article if deleted (ie making it his userpage or a subpage of his userpage)? youngamerican (ahoy hoy) 19:04, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Arbusto 21:38, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete...sorry! Schmiteye 05:56, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.