Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Władysław Krzysztof Grabiński

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. —Cleared as filed. 19:22, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Władysław Krzysztof Grabiński

Originaly proposed for deletion with reason: "nn bio - he was born noble and he dies in a war". There are also no entries in Polish wikipedia (he is Polish). Jan Smolik 16:54, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

• Keep. Article seems to be part of bigger project mapping polish nobility. His mother family has a category of its own with 38 articles. But no entry in Polish wiki. Article can be always deleted or moved to some special project later. --Jan Smolik 16:57, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Think of him as a Polish version of the US revolutionary war nobleman Marie Joseph Paul Yves Roch Gilbert du Motier';' —This user has left wikipedia 18:06 2006-02-05
• Keep at least for now. Maybe worth reviewing later when the overall project is clearer Dlyons493 Talk 18:08, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
• Comment I'm not sure what should be done about this. As Jan Smolik says, the (uncredited) source does indeed appear to be here at a Polish genealogical mapping project Genealogia Dynastyczna. That raises problems of copyright and of verifiability (since Genealogia Dynastyczna carries no information at all about its own sources). Same applies for the whole series of Category:Polish nobility by Witkacy (talk · contribs). Tearlach 20:25, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep The man is a notable figure in Poland and the page is informative. The lack of an article on the Polish site shouldn't be a reason for deletion as it's a less popular language at the moment.Xania 22:27, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

The man is a notable figure in Poland. Odd, then, that I can't find via Google any reference to him except the barest biographical details at Genealogia Dynastyczna and Wikipedia mirror sites. Tearlach 01:29, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

• Keep for now; we'll see if more info is added. —Sesel 23:09, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete The page is not informative at all, since it lacks any information about why he is notable. Modern nobility os generally not notable and dying in WWII is a distinction claimed by too many people. While I hope that the article could be improved, which is why I chose to comment on its talk page instead of nominate for AfD back in October, Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Caerwine Caerwhine 05:03, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.