The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 09:17, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
Non notable person; just 29 Google hits. See also first nomRory096(block) 05:58, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
Delete, no assertion of notability and it has not improved since the first nomination in which some editors advocated a "wait and see" approach. I would reconsider if the article is improved. -- Kjkolb 10:33, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
Delete It hasn't moved on from the last AfD. Dlyons493Talk 12:15, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
Delete The article can always be recreated if someone can make it more than a stub with no evidence of notability, but in its current state it is useless and an embaressment to the Wiki. CaerwineCaerwhine 22:21, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.