Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vulpecula cum Ansere

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirected. Come on people: be bold about these things!. ➨ ЯEDVERS 20:03, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Vulpecula cum Ansere

Unnecessary; see Vulpecula#History Ashadeofgrey 11:40, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 17:03, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

• When an article says "ARTICLETITLE is the old name for OTHERARTICLE", AFD should not be your first thought. Your first thought should be to merge that datum into OTHERARTICLE, which process results in a redirect from ARTICLETITLE to OTHERARTICLE, in line with our Wikipedia:Naming conventions. Uncle G 17:44, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

It (technically) doesn't need to be merged; all the information is in the other article. Having said that, I probably should've redirected--Ashadeofgrey 18:01, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.