Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vulcan High Command
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was No concensus (default keep). JERRY talk contribs 19:46, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Vulcan High Command
This article appears to be bereft of notability or referencing, and as such repeats various plot points about Vulcans from the Star Trek franchise. As there is already an article on Vulcans and all of their aspects, there is no need for this part of Vulcan society that asserts no notability of its own. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 05:23, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. -- -- pb30<talk> 06:27, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, non-notable fictional organisation with no wider relevance outside of the Star Trek universe. Better suited to Memory Alpha than here. Lankiveil (talk) 06:33, 30 December 2007 (UTC).
- Merge with parent article on the planet Vulcan. - Dravecky (talk) 07:31, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
- Keep the Vulcan article seems a bit too long. The Vulcan High Command was a major plot device on many Star Trek Enterprise episodes. Fosnez (talk) 08:10, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
- Merge - While Vulcan (Star Trek) is getting long, I think the essence of this article can be transfered over to the section on government and history (I think the most important parts are already there). I would also suggest Redirect after deletion. LonelyBeacon (talk) 09:28, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
- Merge and redirect to the article on the species, as has already been done for others where there is little material e.g. Ferengi. - Fayenatic (talk) 09:53, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
- Redirect to Vulcan. Add a brief statement about the High Command if it is not already there. --Polaron | Talk 21:45, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. It's doubtful secondary sources exist to establish notability and it's mostly just plot summary. Doctorfluffy (talk) 15:25, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
- Merge to Vulcan (Star Trek). In the absence or proper sourcing (independent, secondary & reliable), this subject cannot have its own article. While the target is rather large, it can be considerably shorted by improving with a thorough application of WP:WAF. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 11:23, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
