Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vulcan Energy Drink

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 01:14, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Vulcan Energy Drink

Vulcan Energy Drink (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable drink product. A whopping four Ghits. No sources provided in the article to assert notability of this product. Lankiveil (speak to me) 07:49, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete Non-notable product, already speedied a few minutes ago for advert. -Optigan13 (talk) 07:57, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

There is no reason to mark them for del you just are doing it because I am new at this. All of these drink companies are important the energy drink company is the only one in the world like it and the beer company is the only working one based in Alabama it looks like you just like to put thinks on real / imported info that means to me you don’t do your research before and that make you and others like you look a kid I am new at this and this is hard for me to do. I worked over 8hr on the energy drink today it would be nice if you would help people like me. I know the owners and they are good people that is how I I have the info on the companies. PAT LONG --Pat Long (talk) 09:03, 9 March 2008 (UTC)—Preceding unsigned comment added by Pat Long (talk • contribs) 08:47, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

why--Pat Long (talk) 09:13, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

comment Pat, I can't find any reliable sources to help you fix this article. The official website doesn't even work. Can you provide anything from a newspaper, website or other periodical that talks about Vulcan? Maybe even a local press clipping if it's one of the only drinks of this type made in the local area?--Torchwood Who? (talk) 09:59, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

while it may not be A11, it's a product listing with no evidence that it's in any way notable and no evidence that it actually is. I realise Pat Long is doing his/her best to promote products she's close with, but that doesn't make them notable TRAVELLINGCARIMy storyTell me yours 16:47, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

  • Don't Delete If you say Vulcan is not ok then these are not to Hype energy Joose Joose Art of the can Bawls Lost Energy Cult Shaker Sustagen and 60 more just like them--Pat Long (talk) 18:12, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete An article consisting only of product availability, suggested uses, ingedients, nutrition facts and a sole link to the company website most definitely equates to spam. Ros0709 (talk) 11:05, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete Advertising. I looked for sources and they just aren't there.--Torchwood Who? (talk) 11:50, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete unsourced advertorial. Guy (Help!) 13:07, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Note Pat Long, Creator has been blocked for 31 hours TRAVELLINGCARIMy storyTell me yours 14:20, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
  • delete unsourced, "official website" doesn't exist, only Ghits outside of wikipedia (& wikipedia related coverage) are two Startrek sites referring solely to an inworld product. No evidence that this product exists, cannot refute hypothesis that this is a hoax. Pete.Hurd (talk) 20:16, 10 March 2008 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.