Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vsevolod Holubovych
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep; nomination withdrawn.--Kubigula (talk) 04:44, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Vsevolod Holubovych
This article is a long and rambling biographical essay, not an encyclopedia article - Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought. Non-neutral. It's impossible to see how it could be edited into anything suitable for Wikipedia.Nom withdrawn andy 17:00, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --Legis (talk - contribs) 17:38, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
Weak delete. After reading through a good portion of it, I am more confused than before. Is this a copyvio, an essay, a biography, or what? If someone can edit it into something sensible, then consider this vote struck, but as it is... --Gwern (contribs) 17:41 15 October 2007 (GMT)- Keep. I don't know too much about the Ukraine, but now he seems notable. --Gwern (contribs) 12:59 16 October 2007 (GMT)
- Keep and stubify. I tagged this with the {{essay-like}} template because the article itself is a mess, but the subject of the article appears to be a notable Ukranian historical figure. For example, this reference indicates that he was a foreign minister. Since the current text issuch a mess, it might be a better idea to stubify the article and start over. -- Whpq 18:36, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
- Comment - agree, and I've done that. He definitely appears to have been notable. Hal peridol 19:23, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
- Keep the stubified version. Goochelaar 21:19, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
- Comment. I'll go along with the stubification (is that a real word?) unless the author objects. Give it another day or so and I'll withdraw the nomination. Glad someone was able to find a nugget of sense in the article! andy 22:24, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
-
- Comment - It really doesn't matter if the author objects to the stubification, the article is about a notable figure, and other wiki policies and guidelines would end trimming almost all of that article away. -- Whpq 22:52, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
- Quite right. I withdraw the nomination in favour of stubification. andy 11:00, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
- Comment - It really doesn't matter if the author objects to the stubification, the article is about a notable figure, and other wiki policies and guidelines would end trimming almost all of that article away. -- Whpq 22:52, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
- Keep the stubified version. Edward321 23:12, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
- Keep and improve.Biophys 06:17, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
