Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vowel rotation

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Joyous 00:24, Feb 5, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Vowel rotation

Looks like a prank-cum-nonsense article tbh. "The famous" Leare Songlitun gets precisely zero google hits. See also Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Inglosh Lengaegi above. -- Francs2000 | Talk [[]] 14:04, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)

• Vowel rotation is an important practice for replenishing pages of their nutrients. Unless it's not. Delete. -R. fiend 18:29, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Considering the vowel rotation scheme, you should probably be googling for "Laura Singleton" instead. However, although this gets you 1,010 hits, adding "vowel" will bring you down to 0 again. In plain Inglosh: Diliti. / Alarm 22:47, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Mikkalai 23:13, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• BJEUDN. Raven42 00:18, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• I'd weakly suggest a redirect to Al Bhed, Substitution cipher, or Vowel shift. - RedWordSmith 00:41, Jan 30, 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to Vowel shift, nothing here worth keeping. Megan1967 02:55, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Vowel shift is probably not an appropriate redirect because it is a)an entirely different concept, and b)a real phenomenon rather than BJAODN fodder. --TenOfAllTrades 04:23, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, do not redirect. Wile E. Heresiarch 13:06, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as drivel. --Angr 13:35, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Beta_M ^talk, |^contrib (Ë-Mail)
• Dileet thees silli jok. Edeans 04:07, 3 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.