Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vowel line

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WjBscribe 01:49, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Vowel line

Vowel line (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

(Note: I am a Preds fan) The "Vowel Line" was a cute media story during the 2001-02 season, but considering it only lasted for part of a season, was usually the second/third line, and the Preds finished 15th in the conference that season, this lacks any historical notability other than being mentioned as a footnote in the 2001-02 section on the Nashville Predators page. - Smashville 18:13, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hockey-related deletions. —Djsasso 19:45, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Not notable enough for its own article. I believe there is a list of famous lines. Perhaps a small note could be added on it, if it is not already. --Djsasso 19:45, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete A mention could be added to 2001-02 Nashville Predators season when it gets created, but doesn't seem to have the notability to stand as its own article. Resolute 19:47, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
• Strong Delete: The mania for creating "line" articles (when very few have genuine notability beyond their players) boggles my mind, and I grew up in the era when forward lines comprised of great stars were paired together for several years at a stretch. An ephemeral grouping consisting of third-liners who've failed to win distinction either as a group or as individuals? No. If the editors on the Predators' article really think this novelty name is one of the highlights of the 2002 season, to be memorialized for all time, I'd really like to see the argument, but a standalone article? Fails WP:NN.  RGTraynor  13:00, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom and agree to User:Resolute's suggestion -Pparazorback 17:21, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.