Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Voldern

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Rossami (talk) 04:53, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Voldern

Vanity, non-patent nonsense. FreplySpang (talk) 17:32, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)

• delete - it may be a local passing fad but that's all JoJan 18:25, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Userfy → User:Voldern. --Allen3 ^talk 20:36, Mar 29, 2005 (UTC)
• Userfy, concur. He already has a registered account on Wikipedia. Megan1967 06:42, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. User pages aren't intended for this purpose. He's got a website, that should be enough for him. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 11:21, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Userfy Leave it user:SkjalgB
  • This user has no more contributions, except for Voldern and vandalism of this page. - Mike Rosoft 16:46, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Spam and blatant vanity. Due to the content and since User:Voldern doesn't have any other contributions, delete and don't move to a user page. Wikipedia is not a personal website provider. - Mike Rosoft 16:42, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete Pavel Vozenilek 17:54, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.