Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Volconvo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 02:25, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Volconvo

Volconvo (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non Notable Nick Catalano contrib talk 00:22, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete As stated, non-notable, not enough info to keep about a small organization. Tcpekin 00:33, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:NN. mrholybrain's talk 01:35, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete violate WP:WEB. Wooyi 02:46, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nomination. Inkpaduta 03:25, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:WEB--Ed ¿Cómo estás?Reviews? 03:29, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete It fails WEB and also NN. Daniel5127 <Talk> 05:21, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, website which does not appear to be notable enough to pass WP:WEB. Lankiveil 12:37, 11 February 2007 (UTC).
  • Delete I agree with the other editors, it fails WP:WEB in the first paragraph.TellyaddictEditor review! 16:09, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per above. Causesobad → (Talk) 16:27, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete asside from failing WEB (as mentioned) - I can't help but wonder if this reads like an advertisement. I mean they describe the forum with apparent weasel words (well, they don't actually say according to some ... but the phrases near the end like "intellectual","informative", and "constructive" are obviously the author's own opinion due to lack of sources - and lack of ability to prove - hey, it also violates WP:NPOV I guess), you can't help but think so. Daniel()Folsom T|C|U 17:14, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. --MasterA113 22:47, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete fails WP:WEB.-- danntm T C 00:11, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.