Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Voice-to-note

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn, as merged. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 17:52, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Voice-to-note

Voice-to-note (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Appears to be used with this definition only in a few sources, including the reference. It may have other meanings. {{prod}} removed by article creator and sole editor. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 20:30, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

my apologies. was looking for your argument on the article itself's discussion page. i agree with merging it into a main article like Voice recording or whatever if such exists. Do not think it should be deleted. Chantoke 23:30, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.