Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vocal Point (University of Delaware)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Singularity 00:17, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Vocal Point (University of Delaware)

Vocal Point (University of Delaware) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable college a cappella group. There are no references to independent, published sources or even an unsourced claim to meet a notability criterion at WP:MUSIC. Only claims to notability are winning minor regional awards. These do not amount to a bonafide justification for an article, as there is not sufficient sourced content which does not originate from the group itself (the group's website is the only "reference" given). Take it to Acapedia, or a similar site, which does not share Wikipedia's notability requirements. Savidan 00:03, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete Per nom. No sources to indicate any notability. The fact that one Vocal Point is notable does not make this one (or even Vocal Point) notable. UnitedStatesian 01:40, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep. Needs a re-write, and sources, but is salvagably, and if properly sourced will pass WP:MUSIC. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry 02:25, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
If rewriten it could pass WP:MUSIC? Maybe. But which criteria do you think it could pass? Savidan 03:32, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak Delete per lack of coverage from independent sources Corpx 05:04, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Not sure why it is notable and no independent sources Harlowraman 09:45, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom, and the fact that the article fails WP:MUSIC. --Nenyedi TalkDeeds@ 11:49, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. wikipediatrix 18:29, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. No independent sources provided. --Metropolitan90 07:19, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete no reliable sources and no indication of meeting notability guidelines. Nuttah68 14:31, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Languages