Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vlq

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. PeaceNT (talk) 12:13, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Vlq

Vlq (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Clarityfiend (talk) 03:54, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Comment: Could this article be expanded, or is it destined to forever remain a dictionary entry? If it is, then merge into Barbershop music, export into Wiktionary, or both. If this article has potential, don't do either. SeanMD80^{talk | contribs} 04:02, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

• Delete and add sentence to Quartet instead. Redirect the term to Quartet if necessary. Non-notable word and, as noted, this is Wikipedia, not Wictionary. VigilancePrime (talk) 04:31, 5 January 2008 (UTC) :-)
• Delete, another place this could be mentioned is in Barbershop music (which doesn't look to be in the best shape). I doubt this will ever be more than a dicdef, unfortunately. Lankiveil (talk) 07:13, 5 January 2008 (UTC).
• Delete, too uncommon term to have its own article. JIP | Talk 17:56, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.