Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vlaams Belang (disambiguation)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 00:28, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Vlaams Belang (disambiguation)

Delete. Nonsensical disambiguation Intangible 03:24, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

• Comment I can't speak to whether or not it is nonsense (it doesn't seem to be on the surface), but if this is deleted, then the origin of it needs to be deleted as well: ASBL vlaams belang VZW. User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 04:31, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
• Dab pages are unnecessary when there's only one article called Vlaams Belang. Since this one has been up since August, it has apparently not been created with a view to creating the other page, so delete. ::Supergolden:: 12:17, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete it's not nonsense in the wikipedia sense of that word but it is highly unnecessary to have this dab page. The other link that is currently red appears to be deserving of a mention on the Vlaams Belang page at most as it is a reference to this political party. MLA 12:21, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
• Comment It is well established precedent that dab pages can legitimately have red-link content. The article should be deleted for reasons other than "it only has one live-link and one red-link", otherwise there are quite a few other pages that should be deleted on exactly the same grounds. I personally don't like this precedent, but it exists nonetheless. User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 12:38, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

• Comment redlink content on a dab seems fine, it's surely not so fine when a dab exists for just one redlink item alongside one live link as that suggests there is no need at all for the dab page. Separately, I've just noticed that the only page that links here is also up for AfD. Typing Vlaams Belang does not get to this dab page. MLA 15:18, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

• Comment I only got aware of a possible disambiguation after user Ceyockey added it to the Vlaams Belang article earlier today (I reverted that change). The Vlaams Belang article has never had a disambiguation put to it before. Intangible 15:57, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

• Comment The "ASBL vlaams belang VZW" article had a disambiguation tag on it previously, which is why I picked up on it; I believe it hadn't been edited in something like 70 weeks; if you look back at an Aug 2005 version of Vlaams Belang (disambiguation), the notion of disambiguating this term is not new. User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 01:37, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

• Comment Here is what it is about [1]. My French is not what it was so I'm struggling to make any sense of it. Looks pretty non-notable, although I could be wrong. Unless an article appears soon I vote delete the disambiguation page. Keresaspa 17:33, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
• Comment. Article seeks to disambiguate between the original Vlaams Belang, and an "asbl" that apparently opposes them. I'd first like to know what an asbl is, and we don't even have that article, it seems; it seems to be some kind of legal term of art in Europe. Smerdis of Tlön 17:40, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. This ASBL is a opposition group against the right-wing Vlaams Belang; I've no idea about their notability, but this is not a disambiguation issue. Any links to this ASBL's article should be in Vlaams Belang itself. Sandstein 18:53, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.