The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep. Mostly Rainy 13:01, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
An odd fork that just collates information already arailable in other articles (all easily accessed though the template. Delete--Peta 03:20, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
Keep as it seems viable to have an article focusing specifically on the debate about this issue. However, I would like to see the purported subject gone into in more depth and the info available in other articles reduced. Tyrenius 15:30, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
Keep per Tyrenius. B.Wind 00:21, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.