Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vitality (magazine)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. J-ſtan^Contribs_{User page} 22:14, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Vitality (magazine)

Vitality (magazine) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Article does not seem to meet WP:NOTE and has little context Alexfusco⁵ 02:32, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. —Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:50, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Not notable. GJ (talk) 17:54, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions. —Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:51, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
• I've read it on occasion myself, but it's not especially notable — I'd frankly hazard a guess that almost every major city in North America has a pretty similar local publication, and content-wise it's only about one step removed from a Learning Annex course catalogue. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 06:40, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.