Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Virtudyne

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 20:24, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Virtudyne

Fictional company which has only one source. Daily WTF stories are not notable in themselves. Fagstein 22:01, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

• Merge with The Daily WTF (although that article has questionable value as well). In any case, Virtudyne to be notable on its own. -Amatulic 23:07, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Unlike the simdesk article, I'm afraid I don't see how to turn this article into something that qualifies for being in the wikipedia. It is not notable. Wrs1864 23:53, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, nonexistent and not notable. Gazpacho 00:36, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Stuff that was in a website last week or so, no matter how funny, doesn't usually exactly equal Good Article Topic. (Yeah, I'm a fan of TheDailyWTF. No, I still don't think random bits of fun = good topic. Maybe if they could set up PaulaWiki, the Official TDWTF Extended Universe Wiki for this sort of stuff...) --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 09:08, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, brillant prose but unverifiable, non-notable, forumcruft, and original research —ptk✰fgs 11:07, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, while the The Daily WTF is pretty fun stuff and notable it self, individual articles are not notable encyclopædic content. --Sindri 16:53, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:FICT. --Metropolitan90 05:02, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.