Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VirtualBartender.beer.com

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. There were no strong arguments made for deletion. fuddlemark (befuddle me!) 12:45, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] VirtualBartender.beer.com

Non-notable website, advertising article--Zxcvbnm 03:53, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

  • Comment - I can't comment on the notability factor, but I have in fact heard of and visited the site. It gets passed around a ton of internet message boards. --cholmes75 (chit chat) 03:56, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment this is quite widespread on the net, but I'm not sure if it deserves an article.--Andeh 11:17, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment I've been to this site too, it is pretty viral I would suggest merging in to somthing like Viral_marketing but all the examples there have there own articles. Ydam 12:19, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep, it seems to google well, and has a decent number of hits imo. Needs tidying, though. -- cds(talk) 22:01, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak delete, an article just for a section of a website? Delete unless someone supplies some reliable sources for why it's important. - Motor (talk) 22:49, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete -- just a viral fad, not of lasting importance. Sdedeo (tips) 23:18, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep Lesser-known cousin of The Subservient Chicken yet reasonably notable (I stumbled across it last year). OhNoitsJamieTalk 00:49, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep - Other viral advertising campaigns have their own pages, and this is notable among them. Darksun 01:34, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep as an interactive viral site of note. Silensor 07:14, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.