Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Virginia Conn

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Canley (talk) 02:29, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Virginia Conn

Virginia Conn (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Borderline non-notable, per WP:BIO. Gary King (talk) 00:21, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

• Delete As per the nom, she is almost notable. Maybe if one of her plays was a hit she would be notable. Unfortunately, there are thousands of authors like her who published a couple of books and had them featured on some magazines or newspapers, etc. Parent5446^{(Murder me for my actions)} 00:34, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
• Neutral - I'd just like to point out that while not one particular piece that's she has performed in or created is worth significant attention, it is possible that the sum of the parts makes the subject notable, as some of accomplishments are somewhat outstanding, but borderline notable at that. Jd027^chat 00:44, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete: Absolutely none of the article indicates notability. "Getting a reading" is the same thing as "has been submitted," and it has gotten a reading "in New York City" rather than at a particular theater. Chapbooks and little magazine publications are all fine things, but they're achievements shared by thousands a year. They are not indications of a proper encyclopedia entry. Utgard Loki (talk) 18:04, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete, writer awaiting notability. --Dhartung | Talk 11:48, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.